An argument against gun control in america

The police who reacted had help. What would gun control even mean at this point. But focusing on people with mental illness is likely to increase stigma and prevent, not encourage, treatment and access to services.

The rate for intentional homicide in the UK in —the year of the Dunblane Massacre—was 1. Inthe rate rose even further to 1. Hunting, gun collecting, and firearm sports stimulate the economy. In these terms, any gun control is viewed as a threat to liberty, and though the Constitution guarantees rights, it does not enforce anything.

Now we are talking about lost human and animal lives. The 2nd amendment of the Constitution has been interpreted that citizens have the right to bear arms. As for mass shootings: Although the statistics do not show a correlation between gun ownership and gun violence, they do not take other factors into account.

Gun control in the United States is rooted in the Federal Constitution under the 2nd amendment. Naturally, the gun control debate — the same one we have been having for decades — has ramped up again, and opponents are using redundant, deeply flawed arguments against even modest proposals like more background checks or a federal database to track gun sales.

In other words, it happened a single time in thirty years. These numbers have, however, been called into question due to possible under-reporting of violent crimes in the UK.

If everyone was armed, no mass shooter would stand a chance, right. A protracted guerilla war in North America sound good to anyone. Replace every reference to alcohol above with a reference to guns and you have the most assured aftermath of a similar prohibition on guns—except in this scenario, the crimes involved are much deadlier.

Anti gun control supporters stressed that it is the responsibility of the parents to educate their children about guns, and even go as far as teaching them how to appropriately handle firearms so as the can develop a personal sense of fear and respect for them, ant not regard them as toys.

Look, no one is going to stop you from defending yourself. So putting controls on the assault rifle has to be a good thing, right. Opponents claim that almost all gun owners train themselves in their free time.

Gun owners and hunters should not be allowed to carry their sport tools around town, either. That makes Americans more heavily armed than Russians, Pakistanis and people from Afghanistan. Citizens have the right to own arms to protect themselves. More so, criminals already do not comply with the implemented laws, so it would serve logic that would not adhere to any more restrictive or new laws.

Another is called Earth. See results Introduction The recent tragedy in Connecticut has the entire country chattering about gun control. The fact is that there is no point in arguing with liberal gun-control advocates because their argument is never in good faith.

Assault rifles are completely banned. Aroundautomatic and semi-automatic weapons were destroyed and a whole raft of checks and controls brought in. And it seems fairly obvious that making it more difficult to kill someone is a good thing since it may lead to some life-saving contemplation or a victim who has time to escape unscathed or with less severe injuries.

If the government is to start monitoring citizens at this level, then what would stop them from monitoring other aspects while further intruding and violating civil liberties.

Even Latin American countries overrun by drug cartels, with murder rates comparable to war zones—such as Colombia, Mexico, and Guatemala—have fewer guns per capita.

As for mass shootings: The weapon reloads each round on its own—all you have to do is pull the trigger again and again. That makes Americans more heavily armed than Russians, Pakistanis and people from Afghanistan.

It is rare for a person to solely rely on hunting to survive or make a living. Congo, have less heavy weaponry.

Arguments For and Against Gun Control

In the US, the number of intentional homicides in was 10,—a number that would have been much lower without access to guns, but still terribly high. The gun control debate is fueled by opposing sentiments, between those who support gun rights and individuals with anti gun sentiments.

The arguments are rooted in different philosophical applications as well as statistics and facts regarding how firearms can impact society. A Crushing New Argument Against Gun Control Posted at pm on July 30, by Bob Owens God Bless America, and pass the ammunition.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter. The argument against additional measures of gun control in the US is that the level of gun control necessary to make a dent in gun violence statistics would be.

Mexico has some of the strictest gun control laws in the world and yet, inMexico had 11, gun murders ( gun homicides perpeople) compared to the United States that had 9, gun homicides ( perpeople).

10 Arguments For and Against Gun Control For decades, gun control had been a secondary issue in presidential elections. But in the wake of an increasing number of mass, public shootings, presidential hopefuls are experiencing a dramatic shift, and candidates are being forced to talk more on gun control, which promises to become a far more.

Arguments For and Against Gun Control

Nov 16,  · Gun Control Groups Eclipse N.R.A. in Election Spending. The financial dominance of the National Rifle Association was topped by gun control groups that helped win the House for Democrats.

An argument against gun control in america
Rated 4/5 based on 13 review
10 Arguments Against Gun Control - Listverse